Comments [7]


by fredo
on 7/8/2008 @ 8:02am
Another RR masterpiece. Sums up the situation at City Hall precisely.

by NineInchNachos
on 7/8/2008 @ 8:49am
and now news through the soft perspective of PIRATES!

via weekly volcano:

"Terrrm limits up for vote"
www.weeklyvolcano.com/2008-07-03/active-...

by NineInchNachos
on 7/8/2008 @ 9:01am
also I like the bigger tacomic thumb up in the masthead nice work kevin!

by NineInchNachos
on 7/8/2008 @ 11:03am
another The New Takhoman

www.thenewtakhoman.com/070808.html



also inspiration for cartoon:



by NineInchNachos
on 7/29/2008 @ 10:28pm
blogs.thenewstribune.com/politics/2008/0...

by NineInchNachos
on 8/27/2008 @ 9:29pm
* * * NEW TAKHOMAN NEWS WIRE SERVICE * * *

This press release just in from "Vote NO on Tacoma Proposition One Committee".





No on Prop 1



A VOLUNTEER citizen committee to save Tacoma term limits



Contact

Thomas Stenger, 253.227.6184 cell saveourtermlimits@gmail.com

NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

AUGUST 27, 2008



Voter Pamphlet Arguments and

Rebuttal

Statements filed with county today



Tacoma, WA — Thomas Stenger, long time supporter of term limits, filed the Proposition 1 VOTE NO argument on Monday with the rebuttal statements filed today with the county.



Stenger worked with a committee of volunteers as they debated the choice of words to use. At times the discussions were very lively as the pressure built with the tight deadlines mandated by the county auditor's office. The diversity of age, gender, race and backgrounds added to the success of the arguments and rebuttal statements written, appealing to a broad audience.



Stenger applauded the hard work of the volunteers who participated tirelessly during the past couple of weeks. A big “thank you” goes out to all volunteers.



The volunteers who helped are: Catherine Ushka-Hall, Charles Creso, Ken Paulson, John Hathaway, Chris Lucas and Sherry Bockwinkel, and Marty Campbell.



VOTER PAMPHLET ARGUMENT FOR NO ON PROPOSITION 1 IS AS FOLLOWS:


Vote No on Proposition 1



Term limits provide a choice for new leadership which is good for democracy and our city. Voting no on Proposition 1 saves our term limits.



Voters overwhelmingly passed term limits in 1973



Term limits were established when Tacoma was renowned for a lack of checks and balances and catering to insider special interests at taxpayer expense. This followed a historic recall of self-indulgent council members. In 1973, an overwhelming majority of voters made Tacoma the first city in the state to limit the terms of council and mayor.



"… smells of self interest." The News Tribune June 30th 2008

"Putting the proposal on the ballot would inevitably smell of self-interest." (Id.) The council placed this measure on the ballot at a taxpayer expense of $100,000, avoiding the public review process.

Term limits provide for new and diverse leadership

Elected officials without term limits become entrenched incumbents who are virtually impossible to vote out of office. Term limits provide for a more representative council. Vote no on Proposition 1.



Rebuttal statement:



Quite simply, it is in our city's best interest to have more people with community leadership experience, that’s democracy in action.



Ten-year term limits ensure we continue with a citizen council made up of real people, not career politicians.



If politicians can't get the job done in a decade, then term limits level the playing field for others, allowing the best and brightest officials to move up and on.



Please vote no on Proposition 1.

by NineInchNachos
on 9/11/2008 @ 1:04pm
In Favor
Ladenburg
Talbert
Fey
Walker
Manthou

Against
Strickland
Anderson
Mayor Baarsma
Lonergan
Sign In to Comment:

Email *

Password *

   Remember me on this computer

OR

Sign Me Up!